logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2017.08.10 2017구합21327
강등처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff was appointed as a police officer on February 5, 2005, and was promoted to a slope on March 11, 2014. From May 30, 2016, the Plaintiff served in the Busan Southern Police Station B district unit and served in the Busan Southern Police Station.

The plaintiff is working for the Busan Southern Police Station B District, and has one child after marriage with C in 2002, and the Inspector D is working for the shipping team E and the F Team, and the plaintiff and D came to be aware of the work bonus at the time of working in the Southern Southern Police Station G District around July 2012, and the plaintiff came to develop into a bad-wheeled relationship with the plaintiff on September 2015.

1. On October 28, 2015, the Plaintiff violated the order of injury to dignity and direction as police officers, such as having a sexual intercourse with D by administering it with D in the I hotel in the I hotel room located in the Dong-dong, Busan, and having a sexual intercourse at the mother, etc. in Busan, as shown in Table 1.

H I J K L L

2. On March 25, 2016, the Plaintiff: (a) committed assault against the spouse three times before and after the end of March 23, 2016, as shown in Table 2; (b) assaulted the spouse on three occasions before and after the end of March 25, 2016; (c) assaulted the Defendant’s 102, the Busan Southern-gu M 102, by causing violence, such as the damage of 14-day catum catum catums and the injury of catum catum catums in need of treatment for 14-day catums; and (d) by causing the police officers belonging to the N Zone of the Southern Police Station of the Southern-gu Police Station to dispatch the site to the site, and thereby doing so, doing so seriously detrimental to the dignity and dignity of police officers, such as having the police officers

M

B. On September 2, 2016, the Defendant, subject to a resolution by the General Disciplinary Committee for Police Officers of the Busan Metropolitan City Provincial Police Agency, caused the following disciplinary grounds to the Plaintiff.

arrow