logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2020.06.24 2019고단2108
자격모용사문서작성등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The preparation B of qualification-based private documents did not have been delegated the authority to conclude a contract for the lease of the building site and building E in the name of Jeonnam-gun Co., Ltd., the deceased father C was the actual representative, or to prepare a lease contract;

Nevertheless, around 14:00 on January 29, 2018, the Defendant stated in the coffee shop the trade name located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, that “Yenam-gun E” in the seat column of real estate in the land column, “land category, area 14,396 square meters” in the land column, “a structural structure and use sniff beam beam, area 5,467.20 square meters” in the building column, “18 buildings size, 5,467.20 square meters” in the section column to be leased, “a total sum of 18 buildings size, 5,467.20 square meters” in the column to be leased, “a gold million won/monthly” in the lessor column, “D and agent B” in the name of the above B, and affixed the corporate seal imprint of D Co., Ltd. in the name of the said B.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of exercising his right, prepared one copy of the real estate lease agreement, which is a private document on rights and duties, using the qualification of agent of D Co., Ltd

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in Paragraph 1, delivered the real estate lease contract prepared as above to F as if it had been duly formed.

3. The defrauded made a false statement to the effect that the Defendant was entitled to enter into a lease contract for the land and building in the name of the said company, and that he/she also has the right to receive rent, as the victim F is the representative of D Company B to the victim F at the date and place specified in paragraph 1

However, in fact, B was not the representative of D and did not have the right to enter into a lease contract or to receive a rent.

On February 14, 2018, the Defendant received 36,000,000 won from the victim to the national bank account in B’s name on February 14, 2018.

Accordingly, the defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement with respect to G and F.

arrow