The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

According to the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor with the summary of the grounds for appeal, in particular, the black CD images, the fact that the Defendant intentionally caused a traffic accident as stated in the facts charged in this case, and by deceiving the insurance company with respect to the occurrence of an accident and the cause thereof, can be recognized.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged of this case is erroneous.

2. Determination

A. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant intentionally induced a motor vehicle traffic accident, and committed an insurance fraud with intent to commit an insurance fraud by taking the method of receiving hospital treatment while driving as if human damage was caused by the traffic accident caused by negligence.

around 13:30 on February 16, 2017, the Defendant: (a) while driving a B-house in front of the permanent residence tunnel in Jung-gu, Busan, the Defendant: (b) discovered that the D-car of the C-A-A-A-C-A-A-A-A-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U-U.

B. The judgment of the court below is that ① most of the traffic accidents listed in the facts charged in the instant case are dealt with by both parties and offices, and ② Defendant vehicle is faced with other vehicles.