logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2018.03.22 2017고단2312
건조물침입
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was a person who resides in the first floor of the building owned by the victim D in Ansan-si, Ansan-si, and was requested by E, etc., the owner of the above building at around 2010, to manage the public toilets for both men and women on the first floor and the second floor of the above building, and jointly managed the above toilets with G, the main operator of the "F" in the building of the commercial building.

On June 6, 2017, around 02:50, the Defendant, on the foregoing grounds, had the key to the above toilet, and string it into the string column in the above toilet, and string the shape of female customers in commercial buildings with a view to satisfying the Defendant’s sexual desire.

The Defendant confirmed the presence of female customers within the “F” point, and invadedd the above public toilet with a view to having stolen that female customers see the tiltilted in the toilet, and then h (30 years old) who is the main guest of the above public toilet, entered the string space above the string space, and h (30 years old) with a hole attached to the wall above the string space, and h h h h h h h h h h h and h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h, against the will of the joint manager G with a view to fulfilling sexual desire against the victim G.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd the victim D-owned structure managed by the victim G.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. The nature and circumstances of the crime are not good in light of the reasons for the sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, and the circumstances and details of the crime;

However, there is no record that the defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime, and the age, environment, etc. of the defendant is recognized.

arrow