Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a daily employee who has been in charge of cleaning the place of business after the completion of his/her duties in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

1. On September 5, 2015, the Defendant, while cleaning inside the E located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government from around 09:0 to 20:00, discovered a son’s 6 mobile phone with a large amount of KRW 900,000,000 at the market price of the victim F, which fell into his/her place of business, and stolen it by using a cre in which the surrounding surveillance was neglected.

2. On September 5, 2015, the Defendant, while cleaning inside H located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G on September 5, 2015, 09:00 to 20:00, the Defendant discovered a 4-on phone at a gallon with a view to creating approximately KRW 700,000,000 at the market price where the victim I fell into his/her place of business, and stolen it by using the gap where the surrounding surveillance was neglected.

3. On September 13, 2015, the Defendant: (a) discovered a 6-phone carrying phone at the market price of approximately KRW 900,000,00,000, 00 to 20:0; (b) discovered a 6-phone carrying phone at the victim J’s place of business; and (c) stolen the phone by using a cre in which the surrounding surveillance was neglected.

4. On September 19, 2015, the Defendant: (a) was cleaning inside the H as described in paragraph (2) between around 09:00 to 20:00, the Defendant discovered a 5S cell phone in the face value of KRW 880,00,000 at the market price of the victim K, which was damaged by the place of business; and (b) destroyed the phone by using a cre in which the surrounding surveillance was neglected.

5. On September 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) discovered a 6-on phone phone with a large amount of KRW 900,000,00,000 at around 09:0 to 20:00; (b) discovered a son’s mobile phone with a large amount of KRW 900,00,00,00 at the market price of the victim’s place of business; and (c) stolen it by using a cre in which the surrounding surveillance was neglected.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F, I, L, K, and J;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of cell phones which are seized objects;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code to increase concurrent crimes.