(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2012.11.15 2012고단4650

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2012.11.15 2012고단4650

과실치사

Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for ten months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant from March 2, 2012 at Gangnam-gu Seoul High School.

4. By 30.0, he/she was a current or former teacher in the third grade session.

The Defendant, which was conducted on March 9, 2012, designated the victim D (the age of 17) to clean the zone outside the glass of the said class field for the purpose of having the students clean up the specific zone of the C High School’s three-year class classes, which was conducted on March 9, 2012.

However, C High School's third grade class class class class class class class class class classes are located in the fifth class of the main office and the height is about about 21 meters, and outside beer part is about 120 cm high from the floor of the rail to the window frame, while the height of rail is about 80 cm high, while it is about 57 cm high, and there is no separate safety device in C High School's internal policy, it was prohibited from cleaning the front side of each class, glass and rail to students.

Nevertheless, at around 07:15 on March 9, 2012, the Defendant neglected his/her duty of care to harm the safety devices or directly supervise the victim when cleaning, while having the victim clean the bend outside of the front door of the said class and playground by cleaning the bend, which resulted in the victim’s death due to the falling of the floor of the first floor meal room in the above glass frame, by neglecting his/her duty of care to clean the bend or directly supervise the said bend.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Each police statement made to E, F, Defendant, G, and H;

1. Each investigation report, the composition and examination plan of environmental saccination, the present status of mobilization of the 119 emergency squad, and requests for appraisal and assessment by the State and the State.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2012.11.15.선고 2012고단4650 판결

-의정부지방법원 2015.10.16 2015고단2423

-창원지방법원 2019.05.02 2018고합276

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.01.25 2012노4059

-서울북부지방법원 2020.10.08 2020고정150