The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case, the punishment imposed by the court below (4 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the business period of the game of this case does not extend and the defendant reflects his wrongs on his own through confinement life. However, the business of the illegal game room, such as the crime of this case, is highly likely to cause social harm by promoting a speculative spirit of the general public and neglecting the home economy. The defendant, as the actual business owner of the game of this case, is carrying E as the "bbow president". The defendant, as the actual business owner of the game of this case, is in a systematic and planned manner by sharing roles with B and C, leading the game room business, etc., and the defendant again commits the crime of this case even though he had the record of punishment for committing the crime of aiding and abetting in violation of the Game Industry Promotion Act. The court below is deemed to have determined the punishment against the defendant in consideration of equity in cases where the crime of this case and the first head of the Game Industry Promotion Act, which became final and conclusive pursuant to Article 39(1) of the Criminal Act, and there is no reason to believe that the defendant's punishment is unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.