The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal that the court below sentenced to the defendant (one hundred months of imprisonment and confiscation) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following facts: (a) the Defendant committed a crime against his wrong act while leading up to a prison life for about five months; (b) the period of the business of the game of this case does not reach a relatively less than two months; and (c) the Defendant is recognized to have no criminal record heavier than the same criminal record or fine; (d) the Defendant has continued to engage in the business of the game of this case by installing 30 game machines to seize all the above game machine; and (e) establishing 19 game machines during the period; (b) the Defendant’s attitude of law is serious; (c) the illegal game room business like the crime of this case, such as the crime of this case, promotion of the public spirit and failure of home economy; (d) the court below seems to have determined the punishment by taking into account all the circumstances favorable to the Defendant; and (e) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, and the circumstances leading to the crime of this case; and (e) the Defendant’s argument that the sentencing of this case is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.