1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Details of the disposition

The plaintiff is a company that produces and sells B, etc.

C. The cooperative (hereinafter referred to as the "cooperative of this case") is a non-profit corporation established mainly for the purpose of the development of the E industry and the promotion of the welfare of its members, among the producers of D and C, sewage pipes B, electricity transmission exclusively, and communication exclusively, and the domestic small and medium enterprises producing E, the main purpose of which is the development of the E industry and the promotion of the welfare of its members. The plaintiff, F & G companies, G companies, H companies, H companies, I companies, J, K companies, J, K companies, L, M companies, M companies, M companies, N companies, andO companies (hereinafter referred to as "members of this case" of each of the above companies, and the "stock companies" in the name of each company is omitted) are members of the cooperative of this case (hereinafter referred to as "B").

At the request of the procuring entity, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with a multiple contracting entities using the Internet SPS bid system (www.g2b.go.k) and displays the list of goods in the Internet integrated shopping mall at the request of the procuring entity, the Plaintiff refers to a contract with the procuring entity to supply goods through the Internet integrated shopping mall whenever necessary at each procuring entity. The contracting entity means a contract with the procuring entity to supply goods to the procuring entity.

The English weak is Mulle A MAS.

(hereinafter referred to as the “Mas”) with respect to the B-purchase bid ordered by the two-stage competitive method, from the year 2012, the member companies of this case agreed with the above-mentioned B-production companies, which are members of the instant procuring entity, to share and share the proposed price in advance, and to submit a proposal in accordance with it and submit it and submit it, thereby making the pre-determined supplier selected as the supplier, and thereby making the supplier selected as the supplier.

(hereinafter “instant collaborative act.” The Defendant, on November 3, 2016, issued the instant judgment against the Plaintiff.