The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal: The punishment (two years of suspended sentence for ten months of imprisonment, eight million won of fine, four million won of a surcharge, and 80 hours of community service) imposed by the court below, which is unfair in sentencing, is too unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case, where the judgment was made, harming the formation of salt in performing public duties, putting away social trust on the legitimate performance of public duties, with a high possibility of criticism, and (b) the defendant voluntarily accepted a bribe, and (c) the defendant delivered a bribe to the co-defendant A, and all of the bribe received on August 1, 2016 by the defendant who received the bribe on August 1, 2016.

However, as long as the Defendant received a bribe in relation to his duties on July 4, 2016, around one year after the instant crime, according to the report by a public interest informant on July 4, 2016, it appears that it would have been the time of commencement of self-audit of Chungcheongnam-do. As long as the Defendant received a bribe in relation to his duties, the Defendant had lawfully performed his duties without relation to the bribery

하더라도 공무수행의 염 결성과 공정성에 관한 사회의 신뢰는 이미 상실된 점, ㉲ 형사책임과 징계책임은 별도의 것으로서 피고인이 이 사건 범행 이후 해임처분을 받은 것은 형의 양정에 크게 고려할 요소는 못되는 점 등에 비추어 보면, ㉲ 피고인이 이 사건 범행을 인정하고 반성하는 점, ㉳ 피고인에게는 음주 운전으로 1회 벌금형을 선고 받은 전력 외에 다른 전과는 없는 점 등 피고인에게 유리한 사정을 십분 감안하더라도, 원심이 선고한 형이 너무 무거워서 부당 하다고 볼 수 없다.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.