The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal is improper because the sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for one year is too unreasonable (the suspended sentence of two years and the fine of 40 million won).

2. It is recognized that the Defendant’s confession and reflects the instant crime, there is no previous conviction exceeding the fine, and the Defendant’s actual performance of duties after receiving the instant bribe does not peep.

However, the crime of this case is accepted a bribe in relation to the order of removal from the removal company by the defendant, who is a director of the Housing Redevelopment Project Association, and it is highly necessary to strictize that it impedes the fairness of the performance of duties of the Housing Redevelopment Project Association and the trust of society in the purchase of the non-performance of duties. The defendant appears to have first demanded a bribe, and the amount of the bribe that is given and received is not certain, the defendant has the same criminal record, and the defendant has the same criminal record, and other various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument of this case such as the defendant's age, sexual conduct, environment, the course and result of the crime of this case, the circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered to be too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant'

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.