1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1.The facts which have no dispute are subject to no dispute between the parties:

Around May 23, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a lawsuit against Nonparty B and C with the Central District Court for the claim for reimbursement of 201Da5027530, and the above court rendered judgment around May 23, 2012, with respect to KRW 135,068,274, and KRW 66,606,851 among them, from February 21, 1997; KRW 52,125,560, March 25, 1997; KRW 17% per annum from the following day of January 31, 198; KRW 25% per annum from the following day to August 31, 1998; and KRW 20% per annum from the following day to December 31, 1998; and KRW 195% per annum to December 28, 201; and KRW 36,194 and 198 of the above amount per annum to 198.

B. Meanwhile, around July 30, 1990, Nonparty C was engaged in the business of manufacturing painting facilities with the trade name D, which was closed around November 1995. On December 11, 1995, Nonparty C was engaged in the business of manufacturing painting facilities with the trade name E as the representative of B on December 11, 1995.

any obligation described in subsection (1).

2. The summary of the parties’ assertion is the cause of the instant claim. C, around November 22, 2006, established F Co., Ltd. for the purpose of painting installation business and was in office as one director, and was in office as G, and was closed on March 31, 2012, and the same year.

4.5. Around the same address as the above company, H, who is his father, was established as an internal director, and as an auditor, and D, E, F, and Defendant Company, with the aim of evading obligations of C with the same company completely identical business objectives, physical facilities, human resources, etc.