beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B and C shall be jointly and severally liable for KRW 7,00,000 and the period from December 1, 1998 to May 31, 2003.
Reasons
1. In full view of the purport of the entire arguments as to the plaintiff's claim Gap 1-1, 2, and 3, the plaintiff filed a claim suit against the defendants, such as the bill payment, etc., with the Seoul Central District Court 2008Da250406, Oct. 28, 2008, in order to extend the prescription period, to the plaintiff.
A. Defendant B: 7,00,000 won and 25% per annum from December 1, 1998 to May 31, 2003; and 20% per annum from the following day to the date of full payment;
B. Defendant F (Post-Name C) 7,00,000 won and 25% per annum from March 11, 1998 to May 31, 2003; and 20% per annum from the following day to the date of full payment;
C. Defendant E: 6% per annum from June 14, 1997 to April 8, 1998; 25% per annum from the next day to May 31, 2003; and 20% per annum from the next day to the day of full payment;
D. Defendant F shall pay 10,00,000 won with 25% interest per annum from August 5, 1998 to May 31, 2003, and 20% interest per annum from the next day to the day of full payment.
‘The judgment in favor of the entire case' is the judgment in favor of the entire case.
A. The judgment in the prior suit was rendered by Defendant B and Defendant C, the extinctive prescription period of the claim based on the judgment in the prior suit in this case, and the Plaintiff again filed the suit in this case for the interruption of extinctive prescription as the ten-year lapse of the extinctive prescription period of the claim under the judgment in the prior suit in this case, and the Promissory Notes A, which was the due date of February 10, 1998, and the due date of February 10, 1998, and March 10, 1998, hereinafter referred to as “the Promissory Notes A,” respectively
order No. 1-A on the ground that it is a joint issuer.
As stated in paragraph (1), the purport of the claim against Defendant B and Defendant C can be recognized.
According to the above facts of recognition, the defendants are obligated to pay each of the money listed in paragraph (1) of this Article to the plaintiff.
2. Determination as to Defendant C’s assertion
A. Defendant C neither knew the Plaintiff nor issued nor endorsed the Promissory Notes, and Defendant C, on the ground of the third person’s personal seal, made Defendant C engage in such conduct as Defendant C.