1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the dismissal or addition of the judgment of the first instance as stated in the following Paragraph (2). Thus, it shall accept it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Part 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 3, 4, 4, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 1, 5, 1, 5, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1, 2,

Part 4 2 (excluding part of the table) add “B No. 8” to the following:

Part 5, Paragraph 10, “each entry in the Certificate 7,” being “each entry in the Evidence 8, 15,” being “each entry in the Evidence 8, 15,” and the following additions in the Schedule 13:

The Defendant asserts to the effect that “ although the Plaintiff and the Defendant did not sign the above basic supply contract, the remaining parts, excluding the content of the method of payment, shall be complementaryly applied to the cosmetic supply contract concluded orally between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.” However, the term of the supply contract is not sufficient to recognize the fact that the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to apply the remaining parts of the above contract with the exception of the content of the method of payment, and there is no other evidence to support this, the term of the contract cannot be deemed as complementaryly applied to the cosmetic supply contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant.”