1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

The defendants jointly do so to the plaintiff (appointed party) 1,00.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant B and Selection E were students from the first and second grade G middle schools located in F in the Pakistan-si, Pakistan-si on May 8, 2013, which led to the creation of the West during the art class hours around 10:00 on May 8, 2013.

B. Defendant B requested the Selection E to put a vinyl, which has difficulties in cutting a vinyl that could be a main part of the hexace by putting a bad hand on the side of the latter.

Defendant B, in the form of a so-called knife knife, was a vinyl in which the designated parties E had tension with each other by putting both ends in both hands, he partially cut the end of the stude E’s severe fingers, and suffered injury, such as severe credit cutting, which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment.

C. The Plaintiff is the father of the selected person E, and Defendant C and D are the parents of Defendant B.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 4 through 10, 12 through 24, Eul evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including branch numbers), Gap evidence Nos. 3 and 25, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. According to the facts of recognition of Defendant B’s responsibility, Defendant B suffered some of the end portion of the severe fingers caused by Defendant B’s severe injuries, such as the reduction of the credit rating for about four weeks in need of treatment, and caused mental distress to the Selection E and the Plaintiff who is the father thereof. As such, Defendant B is obligated to pay consolation money to the Plaintiff and the Selection E as compensation for damages.

B. Even if Defendant C and D’s responsible minor is held liable for tort on their own due to their ability, if there is a proximate causal relation with the minor’s breach of duty by the supervisor, the supervisor shall be held liable for damages as a general tort.

In full view of the purport of the evidence No. 2’s argument, Defendant B, as a middle student at the time of the tort of this case, is dependent solely on the parents in economic aspect with Defendant C, D, etc.