Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 7,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Cenz motor vehicle.

1. On April 30, 2012, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”) passed the said car at the front of the road located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by setting up an assistant in the future and safely moving back.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and received the back portion of the passenger vehicle left-hand side of the benz as the back portion of the benz car, which was driven by one-way passage from behind the benz car following the benz car.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above business, caused the above E (27 years of age) to suffer from the injury, such as a fluoral finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite feinite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite finite

2. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement) has reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol by a police officer who was dispatched after receiving a report of 112 in relation to the said accident at the same time, at the same place as in the preceding paragraph, as well as by a police officer who was called out after having received a report of 112, as well as by the Defendant’s fluoring of heavy smells in the Defendant’s entrance, such as the Defendant’s fluoring of heavy snow and face with red, and he/she failed to comply with the measurement at intervals of ten minutes on April 30, 2012, the first demand for measurement at around 21:30 on the same day, the second demand for measurement at around 21:40 on the same day, and the third demand for measurement at around 21:40 on the same day

3. The Defendant was dispatched to the site on the same date, time, and place as stipulated in Paragraph 1.