logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.04.24 2015고단574
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, at the Daejeon District Court on September 1, 2006, issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a fine of KRW 2 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Daejeon District Court on October 21, 2008, issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Daejeon District Court on October 21, 2008, and received a summary order of KRW 3 million for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Daejeon District Court on October 4, 2010, respectively, and is a person who is engaged in driving Done Star.

On February 12, 2015, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol on 19:55 and blood alcohol concentration of 0.09%, and the Defendant was driving the Done Starex, owned by the Defendant, and the F farm located in Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, would drive one lane in front of the F farm, which is located in Seo-gu, Daejeon, at a speed of about 40km from the west to the west.

At the time, there is a night and a place where the center line of the yellow-ray is installed, and the road is displayed on the right side, so there was a duty of care to ensure that a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle is obliged to thoroughly operate the motor vehicle in the front and the vehicle is maintained.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, neglected to listen to the interest of the passenger in the rear and returned back to the rear, was due to the negligence of the centering on the center line, and was driven by the driver G (the age of 64) who was driving on the opposite line in front of the said passenger vehicle at the time when the victim G (the age of 64) was driving on the top of the opposite line.

Ultimately, the Defendant, under the influence of alcohol, drives a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol in spite of the fact that he had been punished twice or more times. On the other hand, the Defendant caused the victim’s negligence in the course of performing the above duties to die due to severe scarcity damage and blood scarke, etc. immediately after he was transmitted to the hospital at around 20:22 of the same day, and simultaneously caused the victim I (the son, 61) who was on board the top of the passenger vehicle that the victim driven, to suffer from the 6-day medical treatment.

arrow