1. On June 8, 2009, the Defendant stated the “administrative disposition” column in the attached disposition list against the Plaintiffs.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff C Co., Ltd. (the trade name before the change: J. hereinafter “Plaintiff C”) is a corporation operating the Seo-gu, Daejeon, K, L, M 12 above, and the 7th underground department stores (hereinafter “instant department stores”). The rest of the Plaintiffs are those engaged in resting restaurant business, food subdivision sales business, i.e., spot-sale manufacturing and processing business by leasing the second underground department stores from Plaintiff C.

B. During the period from June 20 to June 30, 2008, the Plaintiffs filed a report on business or a report on change of business (hereinafter “each of the instant reports”) with the content that they are engaged in each resting restaurant business, food subdivision sales business, i.e., spot-sale business, and spot-sale food manufacturing and processing business, as stated in the attached disposition sheet in the attached disposition sheet at the second basement store of the instant department store, and the Defendant accepted each of the aforementioned reports.

C. However, on June 8, 2009, the Defendant did not comply with the business reporting requirements under Article 27(4) of the Enforcement Rule of the same Act (amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Welfare and Family Affairs No. 132, Aug. 12, 2009; hereinafter the same), and on the ground that the Plaintiffs installed business facilities on the Seo-gu N (Seoul, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, (amended by Act No. 10156, Mar. 22, 2010; hereinafter the same shall apply) or part of the business site was installed on the above N (the underground2, the underground2, and the connecting passage). The above N does not meet the business reporting requirements under Article 38 of the Road Act (amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health and Welfare No. 10156, Mar. 22, 2010; hereinafter the same shall apply) and Article 27(4) of the Enforcement Decree of the same Act (amended by Presidential Decree No. 975, Jun. 27, 2009, 209). 209).

[The facts that there is no dispute over the basis of recognition, Gap 1 to 3, Eul 1, 5.