logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전고등법원 2012.12.20 2012누667
영업신고등 수리처분 취소처분의 취소
Text

1. Revocation of a judgment of the first instance;

2. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. All costs of the lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff (former: the Dongyang department store, Inc.) is a corporation that operates the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, 1036, 1037, 1038 ground-12, and 7 underground-based department stores (hereinafter “instant department stores”).

B. On June 23, 2008, the Plaintiff filed a report on the alteration of business with the content that the place of business of livestock product sales business, which was operated on the 1036th underground floor in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, shall be transferred to the second underground floor in the same place (hereinafter “instant report”). The Defendant accepted the report on June 26, 2008.

C. On June 25, 2009, the Defendant issued a disposition to revoke ex officio the acceptance of the instant report (hereinafter “the instant disposition”) on the ground that the Plaintiff’s on-the-spot inspection conducted on the ground that “the Plaintiff filed a false report on the change of the business report, such as installation of business facilities, on the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-dong No. 1529 (specificly, the connection passage part of the 1529 underground floor linked to the 2nd underground floor linked to the instant underground floor; hereinafter “instant underground passage”), Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon (hereinafter “the instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap's 1, 2, 3, 12, 15, Eul's 2 and 3 (including each number), the purport of all entries, images, and arguments

2. Determination as to the defense before the merits of the Intervenor joining the Defendant (hereinafter “ Intervenor”)

A. The Intervenor’s instant report is a self-sufficient report that does not require separate repairs. The Plaintiff’s report of this case is a real place of business with the location of 1036,00,000,000 Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Daejeon, the actual place of business, which is the location of the actual place of business. This cannot be deemed as a business report on 1529, and it cannot be deemed as a business report on 1529, and Articles 2 and 11 of the former Processing of Livestock Products Act

arrow