A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

From October 24, 2008 to October 57, 2008, the Defendant opened and traded a consignment account at the victim Samsung Securities Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim”)’s C branch, and from October 24, 2008 to October 14:59, the Defendant ordered the Defendant to sell the entire amount of 780 shares of Samsung Electronic Co., Ltd. owned by it through telephone conversations with D employees of Samsung Securities C branch. The Defendant deposited the amount of KRW 317,850,000 from the damaged company to the Defendant’s consignment account.

Nevertheless, the defendant filed a civil petition with the purport that, on October 24, 2008, the customer support center of the victimized company did not have issued a selling order by telephone, and that the selling order should not be concluded because the defendant visited the Seoul metropolitan branch directly after the closing of the closing of the closing of the closing of the closing of the closing of the closing of the closing of the closing of the closing of the closing of the closing. Accordingly, the victimized company

On April 9, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 08:00, at the end of the building in the Jung-gu Seoul Central Government, the Defendant: (b) 250 Samsung-ro 2: (c) cited the scamet stating that “Scam securities are a fraud-friendly crime; (d) self-denunciation of the shares of customers; and (e) return the shares to customers; and (e) let the scam players view the scams at the same place on May 14, 2013; and (e) let the scams view the scams at the same place on May 11, 2013; and (e) around 11:00 on May 16, 2013, the Defendant placed the scam in the front of the building in the Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Government, Seocho-gu Seoul Central District Government, and made the scamscam in front of the scam.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victimized company by openly pointing out false facts over three times.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's partial statement to the effect that there is an act recorded in the judgment as of April 9, 2013 and May 14, 2013 in the first trial record;

1. Each statement made by witness E in the second trial records, D in the fourth trial records, and F in each statement;

1. Recording notes, copies of complaints, and a letter of complaint;