A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

From October 201, the Defendant, from around October 201, engaged in the work of “defluence” in the field of KOSDAQ funeral services in the state of the lower limit, such as F and G, which are market price manipulation experts, in contact with online newspaper reporters, took charge of the role of inserting news articles necessary for the above work, and linking reporters with news articles necessary for listing online newspapers.

On April 25, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 11:00, the shares of H, “I” (hereinafter “I”) of the Company I (hereinafter “I”), a COS funeral service, are accumulated to the lower limit at the present price at the volume of KRW 500,000,000, and thus, (b) the shares offered as security, upon receiving a loan from a major shareholder, would be traded as opposing shares; (c) thus, (d) if the lower limit is at a lower limit and the share price increases, the Defendant was proposed to pay KRW 140,00,000,000.

The above proposal was made by J, the representative director and the major shareholder of I, who are a company manufacturing telecommunications equipment, in receipt of a loan of KRW 3 billion from modern securities, and 924,532 shares of I, and 34,832 shares of I to offer as security and received a loan of KRW 34,832 shares from the school guarantee right, etc., with the purpose of avoiding the lower limit on April 24, 2013 as of April 25, 2013, at the lower limit on the share price of KRW 4,060,000,000 at the second lower limit (3,455 won) was submitted, and it was anticipated that the closing limit would be lower. The defendant requested K to do so for the purpose of avoiding the opposite trade of shares offered as security, and the defendant was bound by the lower limit on the above LW 313 et al. (3, 2013).

After receiving the above request, the Defendant requested F (Detention Prosecution on October 2, 2013) to determine whether he/she can perform the above work, and from F.