The defendant dismissed the application for compensation filed by the applicant for compensation.

1. Around July 18, 2008, the Defendant issued a false statement to the Appellant C (hereinafter “Appellant”) who seeks to purchase the land of Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si (hereinafter “E”) and purchase the land of Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si (hereinafter “the instant land”), to which the Defendant would want to hold a factory, the Defendant may make access access to the instant land, and obtain authorization and permission for the factory site. By November 30, 2008, the Defendant may obtain some of the facility green areas from Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, and obtain new construction permission without the mold. If the Defendant fails to obtain permission, he/she would return money paid within 20 days.”

However, the facts are as follows: ① because the land in this case is surrounded by a buffer green belt, the part of the buffer green belt was removed and the access road was not secured, it was impossible to obtain permission for the factory site and permission; ② At the time of July 18, 2008, the competent authorities such as racing viewing or Gyeongbuk-do Governor, etc. did not have a plan to implement an urban planning renewal project to cancel the buffer green belt in relation to the land in this case; ③ around May 2008, the Defendant issued 1.5 million won to the complainant on May 2008, 1.5 million won from the complainant on the ground that “it is possible to newly construct the factory in the above land, and it is possible to permit the construction of the factory in the above land, and it was not possible to obtain permission for the construction of the factory in the above land. ④ At the same time, 50 million won was transferred from the complainant, and labor expenses were paid out of the remaining amount of KRW 3 million,500,0000,000.