1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On February 21, 2012, the Plaintiff, who protruding two protrudings, was admitted to a dental hospital operated by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant hospital”) to undergo dental correction due to the lack of arrangement of dental organs, such as protruding two protrudings.

The defendant laid off four patriarches (three 1 patriarches and one 2 patriarchs) of the plaintiff, and tried to take corrective treatment to move out to a protruding place by attaching a correction device to a protruding place and induce them to be added to normal intercourse.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant correctional treatment”. The period of correctional treatment was expected to be about 2-3 years.

On March 2, 2012, the Defendant issued the first right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-holder, and first right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-holder, second right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-hand right-holder

From February 21, 2012, the Plaintiff received correction treatment by 1-2 times in one month at the instant hospital.

(I seem to have provided correctional treatment using rubber lines). (C)

On June 2, 2014, the Plaintiff complained of the Defendant with a copy of the right line, and suspended the use of the rubber line.

On June 23, 2014, August 1, 2014, and September 1, 2014, the Plaintiff appealed to the Defendant for a certificate of bad faith to the right.

On June 23, 2014, the defendant explained the precautions, and on September 1, 2014, the Switzerland prescribed them.

(1) On September 25, 2014, the Plaintiff, who was in the mouth of the Jeonbuk University Hospital, was in charge of CT photography and was in charge of physical therapy, but did not undergo the MRI test in the course of correctional treatment. As a result of the CT photography, it was confirmed that the right tropitis, the left tropitis, the left troposis, and the left troposis (the result seems to have been explained to the Plaintiff on October 14, 2014).

(2) On October 14, 2014, the Plaintiff received physical treatment by being admitted to the foregoing dental department.

According to the medical records of the above hospital, although the plaintiff reduced the pain, it was argued that there is any inconvenience to the right at the time of writing, and the opening is over the right at the time of opening.