The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is as follows: (a) even though C voluntarily takes notes in the middle of the credit transaction account book of this case, the judgment of the court below convicts the defendant; and (b) there is an error of law by misunderstanding the

2. The court below duly adopted and examined the evidence, in particular, C's legal statement and the statement of the police on the complainant [the defendant asserts that it is difficult to believe the complainant's statement, but the complainant has consistently made a statement from an investigative agency to the court of the court below, and there is no amount from which the defendant paid the amount in cash or check from the credit transaction between the defendant and the complainant to the beginning of October of the same year, and the defendant asserted that the defendant paid 2 million won in cash and check from the end of September 2009 to the beginning of October of the same year, but there is no way to use the check issued by the complainant or the complainant, and the similar amount is not deposited in the passbook of the complainant's passbook by the end of 200,000 won, and the defendant continued to pay 200,000 won in advance until the end of 200,000 won in advance. According to the above facts, it is difficult to view that each of the above statements by the complainant is credibility and credibility of 200,087,207.