Plaintiff (Attorney Hun-Ba, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant)

The Minister of Culture, Sports and Tourism (Law Firm Rate, Attorney Han-soo, Counsel for plaintiff)

December 3, 2009

Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2008Guhap50629 Decided June 25, 2009

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

On November 25, 2008, the judgment of the first instance is revoked. In the first instance court, it is confirmed that the defendant's action against the plaintiff on November 25, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as "the action of dismissal of this case") is null and void. The action of dismissal of this case

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The court's explanation on this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following advanced portions among the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this Court shall accept it in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

A. To revise the part of the 6th 8-9 Local Public Officials Act that “the provisions of the 7th 'Guarantee of Status’ and the 8th 'Guarantee of Rights and Interests’ are not applicable to the provisions of the 73-2, 74-3, and 76-3 of the 6th 8-9 Local Public Officials Act to the effect that the status and rights are partially guaranteed pursuant to the special provisions of Article 3(1) of the 73-2, 74-3, and 76-3 of the 6th

B. To revise the part of the 7th 6th 6th 6th 6th 6th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and it is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Yu Jong-Un (Presiding Judge)