(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.03.25 2014고단3859

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.03.25 2014고단3859

사기

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who works as the on-site supervision of the victim D Co., Ltd. who ordered the above construction at the construction site of the relocation facility at the Gyeonggi Yang-si.

1. On June 30, 2013, the Defendant claimed labor cost to the victim at the above construction site and obtained 4,825,000 won in total as labor cost of the human body from the victim by deceiving the victim and receiving 2,795,000 won in the name of labor cost of the above E, as shown in the attached list of crimes (1) as follows: (a) from around that time to October 31, 2013; and (b) by deceiving the victim by the same method and deceiving the victim as labor cost of the human body, as stated in the attached list of crimes (1).

2. On June 30, 2013, the Defendant filed a claim for equipment replacement with the victim at the construction site above and around October 31, 2013. The facts are as follows: (a) deceiving the victim as if the actual cost of equipment was KRW 20,795,50 in F and G, which was 27,197,50, by deceiving the victim as if the actual cost of equipment was 27,197,500; and (b) deceiving the victim as a replacement for equipment; and (c) obtained the difference of KRW 6,402,00 from the victim to the victim five times from the time of the occurrence to October 31, 2013; and (d) by deceiving the victim as if the actual cost of equipment replacement was 65,939,500 won, the amount was 88,676,500 won in total and by deceiving the victim under the name of the victim; and (d) obtained the difference of KRW 86,707,707

3. On October 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) did not have any fact that the Defendant was responsible for the construction of the above construction site; and (b) did not have any fact with respect to the machinery and equipment of the master, the Defendant, claiming for the cost of outsourcing to the victim; (c) deceiving the victim as if he/she were responsible for the construction of the master, and deceiving the victim as if he/she were responsible for the cost of outsourcing from the victim, and then

유사 판례

-서울동부지방법원 2015.07.03 2015고정876

-대전지방법원 2014.04.23 2014고정225

-대구지방법원 경주지원 2013.08.12 2012고단1390

-광주지방법원 2017.11.24 2017고단4497

-춘천지방법원 원주지원 2019.10.16 2019고단513