logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.08.21 2020누33246
기타(일반행정)
Text

1. The plaintiff A's appeal is dismissed.

2. (i) Of the judgment of the first instance court, the following order of payment is applicable.

Reasons

1. (i) In the first instance trial, the Plaintiffs claimed against the Defendant for the reimbursement of the cost of moving a house, the reimbursement of the cost of moving a house, and the respective damages for delay, the claim for the provision of a rental house, and the preferential right to move a rental house.

In this regard, the judgment of the court of first instance accepted part of the plaintiff A's claim for housing relocation expenses, director's claim, and damages for delay, and dismissed all of the plaintiff B's claim for housing relocation expenses, director's claim, and damages for delay.

On the other hand, the judgment of the court of first instance rejected all the lawsuits regarding the plaintiffs' claim to provide rental housing and the claim to confirm the right to lease housing.

She filed an appeal against the part against the plaintiffs' loss.

The judgment of the court prior to the remanding of the case was partially accepted as part of the Plaintiff’s appeal concerning the Plaintiff’s claim for expenses incurred in moving residence, the claim for expenses incurred in moving directors, and the claim for damages incurred in delay, and ordered the Defendant to pay the amount additionally. The Plaintiff’s appeal partially accepted the part concerning the claim for expenses incurred in moving directors and the claim for damages incurred in delay among the appeals by

Referencely, the plaintiff A appealed on the part of the claim for damages for delay against the expenses for moving residence and the expenses for moving director, and the plaintiff B appealed on the part of the claim for the expenses for moving residence, the expenses for moving director, and the damages for delay.

On the other hand, the defendant appealed on his part against him.

In this regard, the judgment of remanding the case shall be reversed and remanded to the court of this case, and all appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed, on the part against the defendant who ordered the payment of additional money as to the plaintiff Gap's claim for relocation expenses and damages for delay, and the part against the defendant as to the plaintiff Eul's claim for relocation expenses and damages for delay.

x) this Court, therefore,.

arrow