logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 해남지원 2016.09.28 2015고합42
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(13세미만미성년자강제추행)
Text

The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the president of the E Institute in South and North Korea, and the victim F (V) was a child who was enrolled in the E Institute from October 2013 to November 26, 2014.

On November 1, 2014, between 15:00 and 16:00 on November 2014, the Defendant met with the victim’s drinking by hand from toilets of educational institutes E, and collected the fingers from the victim’s drinking part, and boomed the victim’s suffering.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an act of inserting part of body such as fingers and fingers against a person under 13 years of age.

2. On November 1, 2014, the Defendant and the defense counsel asserted that the Defendant committed an indecent act, such as talking with the victim’s fingers or knifeing knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife.

3. Determination

A. Among the evidence submitted by the prosecutor corresponding to the facts charged in the instant case, each video recording or voice recording CD [the evidence list No. 50 (the statement made by the male and female counseling center at South Korea on Nov. 27, 2014; hereinafter referred to as "prior interview"), No. 10 (the statement made by the former female children's center at the male and female counseling center at South Korea, Nov. 28, 2014; hereinafter referred to as "the first statement")], evidence list No. 73 (the statement made by the branch office at the Southern District Public Prosecutor's Office at the Gwangju District Public Prosecutor's Office, Apr. 29, 2015; hereinafter referred to as "the second statement") recorded in the evidence list No. 50, and the remaining statement made by G police and the statement made by G on Nov. 28, 2014 were meaningful in supporting the victim's statement within the scope of damage.

(b) sexual assault;

arrow