logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.06.01 2015고단4355 (1)
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 18:47 on August 21, 2015, 2015, “D cafeteria” and “F of the police station of the Dong-gu police station of the Dong-gu, which entered the site upon receiving a report 112 report and received the case from the Defendant and E.

At that time, B and C tried to arrest B as a flagrant offender in the crime of assault after suppressing B to commit an assault with a serious bath to E. The above F and G attempted to restrain it.

B, at the time of resistance to the legitimate arrest of a flagrant offender, assaulted, such as cutting down the F’s uniform, pushing ahead of his body, etc., and G committed an assault by committing the act of B, by committing the said F’s body and G’s uniform, and by committing the act of B.

Accordingly, the above F was arrested B and G as the current criminal of interference with the performance of official duties, and the Defendant committed assault, such as: (a) leaving the F and G in a flagrant offender who is arrested by him/her; (b) leaving him/her to the F and G, thereby preventing the arms of the police officer from taking the arms; and (c) repeating the acts of carrying his/her hand and body.

Accordingly, the defendant jointly with B and H interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of police officers in the act of committing a crime.

The defendant of "2015 Highest 554" is the victim I (n, 48 years of age) and the marital relationship reported to marriage on September 22, 2005, and is in separate service from September 1, 2015.

On November 8, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 19:20, at the inside of the K Building, which is the residence of the victim in the wife population J, and (b) on the ground that there was no marriage photograph; (c) on the ground that there was no marriage photograph, the Defendant left the inside part of the victim’s right side for about two weeks due to the drinking of the car, and had the right side, etc. in need of treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to F, G, E, and I;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to damaged photographs, marriage-related certificates, family relation certificates, and death diagnosis certificates;

1. Article 136(1), Article 30(1), and Article 257 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.

arrow