Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The plaintiff is Birs, and served as the Army Soldiers from May 12, 2005 to May 11, 2007.
B. On July 22, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State on the ground that “from February 6, 2006 to February 11, 2006, the Plaintiff saw ice ice ices while performing the duty of attack.” On December 29, 2014, the Defendant rendered the instant disposition against the Plaintiff on the ground that “The application for registration of persons who have rendered distinguished services to the State was ice ice ice ices in the course of performing the duty of attack.” On December 29, 2014, the Defendant rendered the instant disposition against the Plaintiff on the ground that “The applicant’s “protruding gate escape L4-5” was beyond the ice ice ices during the severe training for the nine-month period. However, it is difficult to view the fact that the symptoms of the protruding ray escape occurred due to an acute level (such as a front-way, a fall, etc.)” on the ground that there is no medical opinion to recognize that the symptoms occurred.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1-4, Eul evidence 6-8, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion of the escape certificate of the Plaintiff occurred between February 6, 2006 and December 13, 2006.
On February 6, 2006, the plaintiff was discharged from military service on May 11, 2007 without being discharged from military service after he was involved in the 60m string of 20km in a ice string, and was discharged from military service on February 6, 2006. The plaintiff continued the main special training during the period of the occurrence of the string escape certificate.
The plaintiff's lag escape certificate is a soldier or policeman wounded on duty, and the disposition of this case is unlawful, since the plaintiff's lag escape certificate was caused by an accident beyond the lag and the main speciality training was directly caused.
B. Determination 1) In order to constitute a soldier or policeman wounded on duty under Article 4(1)6 of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State, there should be a proximate causal relationship between the performance of duties or education and training (including diseases), and the performance of duties or education and training are national defense