1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

가. 별지 기재 건물 중 평면도 표시 ㉮,㉯,㉰,㉱,㉲,㉳,㉴,㉮의 각 점을...

1. 인정사실 ① 원고의 남편인 망 D은 2012. 7. 27.경 피고와 사이에 별지 기재 건물 중 평면도 표시 ㉮,㉯,㉰,㉴,㉮의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 27㎡ 부분(이하 ‘이 사건 점포’라 한다)에 관하여 보증금 3,000만 원, 월 차임 120만 원(부가가치세 별도), 임대차기간 2012. 7. 27.부터 2013. 7. 26.까지 12개월간으로 정하여 상가임대차계약을 체결하였다

(hereinafter “instant lease agreement”). (2) The network D died on June 27, 2013, and on the same day, the Plaintiff succeeded to the status of the lessor by succeeding to the attached building, including the instant store.

③ On May 15, 2018, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant on July 26, 2018, to the effect that the instant lease agreement was renewed once a year on the same terms and conditions, and that the delivery to the Defendant of the instant store by the expiration date of the contract as of July 26, 2018.

④ On July 14, 2018, the Plaintiff remitted 25 million won out of the deposit to the Defendant. On March 22, 2019, the Plaintiff deposited the remainder five million won as the principal deposit.

⑤ 피고는 이 사건 점포와 함께 그에 부속된 창고인 별지 평면도 표시 ㉰,㉱,㉲,㉳,㉴,㉰의 각 점을 순차로 연결한 선내 33㎡ 부분(이하 위 이 사건 점포와 함께 ‘이 사건 목적물’이라 한다)도 점유사용하였고, 2019. 3. 26.까지 원고에게 월 차임 120만 원에 부가가치세 12만 원 및 수도요금 1만 원을 합한 133만 원을 매월 지급하였다.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 6 (including branch numbers for those with a satisfy number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the facts as above, it is reasonable to view that the instant lease agreement was terminated on July 26, 2018 without being renewed any longer due to the Plaintiff’s notice of rejection of renewal on May 15, 2018.

As to this, the defendant is a commercial building.