A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. On November 18, 2015, the Defendant assaulted the victim by taking the victim’s timber and pushing the victim’s timber to E, a business owner of the said carpet, who was in the course of the Defendant’s teaching service, on the ground that the victim expressed his/her desire to “Cho, Isia, Isia,” within CKapet, which is located in C, C, C, 2015, and C, which was located in C, 21:10, and C, 2015.

2. In a F cafeteria located in B at the time of the operation of the Victim D (Death on January 3, 2016, 60) around 13:00 on November 19, 2015, the injured Defendant: (a) whether the said victim “any female humsing in dump” is humping for the same reason as the description in paragraph 1.

“In accordance with the theory, the victim and the victim expressed the desire to “Ie this,” and on the ground that they were “Ie two weeks of verte,” the victim’s neck was pushed and pushed down by one hand, the victim’s body was broken by another hand, and the victim’s body was taken over on the floor, thereby causing the victim’s injury to light base and tension that require approximately two weeks of treatment.

3. Obstruction of business;

A. On January 18, 2016, the Defendant entered the state of drinking within the first week in the management of the Victim H (Y, 54 years old) located in G on January 18, 2016, and without any reason, the Defendant “In this year, I would like to see that I would like to see that I would like to see whether I would like to see the following:

We see this theory as follows: “I am I and I am I Ra,” and even upon the demand of the injured party to take out several times, I do not ignore this demand, and I am I am to the customers who continued to drink in the above way. I am I am I, and if you report to the police, I do not do so.

“Along to approximately 20 minutes, customers were forced to leave outside, and thereby interfere with the business of the victim’s soft business by force.

B. On January 18, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was invited from a police officer dispatched for the same reason as set forth in paragraph (3); and (b) went out from the above station; and (c) entered the part of the operation of the Victim K (V, 57 years old) in the J on January 18, 2016, and made an appraisal before the victim and the victim.