1. The plaintiff's appeal and the conjunctive claim added by this court are all dismissed.

2. After an appeal is filed.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court citing the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, with the exception that the pertinent part among the grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance is added and the judgment on the conjunctive claim is added as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance.

2. Additional description;

A. Grounds of the judgment of the court of first instance on the ground of appeal

1.(c)

2) Part A of the upper part of the table (2) is as follows: (a) the 7th 6th 6th eth eth 9th eth eth eth eth eth eth

The current status as of December 31, 2017 as of December 31, 2017, which is the details of purchase of equipment purchased by the Plaintiff after 2014, the value of equipment (the purchase price, the amount of equipment investment money of this case (hereinafter referred to as "the amount of equipment investment money of this case"), the monthly preservation amount divided by the number of months in the depreciation period, the details of the monthly preservation amount, and the unpaid balance (the amount obtained by multiplying the monthly preservation by the number of remaining months), shall be as

B) Of the contents indicated in the table 12, the period of depreciation corresponding to the 12 logs shall be “ October 2017” as “ April 2, 2017.” 2) The reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is as follows.

The main part of the claim is as follows.

The Defendant, regardless of the termination of the instant transport contract, agreed to pay to the Plaintiff in installments the amount of equipment investment and the amount of funds added to the funds required under each of the instant commitments by the end of the depreciation period indicated in each of the respective commitments. The equipment investment and the funds for financing are as listed in the attached Table, from January 2018 to September 2022.

As to the Plaintiff, the Defendant: (a) the sum total of KRW 305,795,021 of the total amount of each relevant month from January 1, 2018 to July 2018 in the attached Table; and (b) the damages for delay calculated by adding 309,453,404 won and the damages for delay calculated at the rate of 6% per annum as stipulated in the Commercial Act from August 7, 2018, which is the service date of a copy of the complaint of this case, to August 7, 2018; and (c) the damages for delay for delay of KRW 305,795,021 among the above 305,795,021, and each corresponding month from August 1, 2018 to September 9, 2022