1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiff citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and judgment of the court of first instance are justified even if the evidence submitted in the court of first instance is comprehensively based on the evidence submitted in the court

Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is consistent with the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the following parts written or added. Therefore, the relevant part of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(hereinafter referred to as the "ad hoc name of the judgment of the first instance"). 2. Cut-off or added part of the judgment of the first instance shall be 1-C of the judgment of the first instance.

“O bank P” in the sequence 6 in the table stated in the paragraph is “O bank AH.”

A 6-4 No. 1-3 of the first instance judgment.

Of the table in the paragraph 9, “T Bank U” in 9 is raised to “T Bank AI.”

A No. 8 3-C. 1 of the first instance judgment.

"T Bank W" in 11 of the table in the table in the paragraph is raised to "T Bank AJ".

B up to the 18th 7th 7th 7th son's judgment of the first instance court, "However, there is a duty to pay" as follows.

“The Defendant at his own discretion used the credit card amount of KRW 2,981,340 in the above account, and withdrawn KRW 36,575,00 in the name of CM, and transferred KRW 36,575,00 in the spouse AK, and withdrawn KRW 1,530,00 in the account of C in the Z bank (A), the Defendant is obligated to return the sum of KRW 44,086,340 in the amount of KRW 36,575,00 in the amount of KRW 36,575,00 in the amount of KRW 36,575,00 in the amount of KRW 3,50,585 in the name of C and D in the unjust enrichment. Accordingly, the Defendant is obligated to pay KRW 11,021,585 in the amount of KRW 44,086,340 in the amount of KRW 1,50 in the name of the Plaintiff around May 15, 2015.”

All of the financial assets deposited with the defendant's account are as follows from 7th to 8th day of the first instance judgment around January 2015.

As alleged by the Defendant, the inheritee.