A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. At around 13:20 on May 3, 2014, the Defendant: (a) laid down in a store located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, the Defendant: (b) took advantage of the gap in which D’s surveillance, a security guard, was neglected; (c) 1, quino, 2, 3, and 110,430 won in total, including one launching-type mixing type, two quino-type forest, one point on women’s use, three points on dissolved, and other things, and stolen the things of others.

2. Forgery of private signature, and the use of a false investigation or signature;

A. On May 3, 2014, the Defendant requested the police officer to sign a confirmation letter stating “I, upon arrest of flagrant offender, appoint a person suspected of committing a crime, the reason for arrest, and his defense counsel, and confirm that I given the opportunity for defense upon receiving notification that I would have been given the right to request a review of legality of the arrest,” and submitted it to the said police officer after entering “F” as the birth name, in the confirmer column, after being arrested as flagrant offender under the criminal charge of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Police Station and the office of the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Police Station and the criminal charge of the above Paragraph (1).

B. The Defendant was investigated by the police assistant G from the police officer assigned to the above police station on the above date, at the above time, at the place, and under Paragraph (1) of the same Article, and thereafter, submitted to the above police officer a statement in the column of the person who requested the above police officer to sign and seal an interrogation protocol, and was stated as the above F.

Ultimately, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant, without authority, forged the above F’s signature, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Written statements of D;

1. A certificate (F);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged articles;

1. Articles 329 and 239 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny in a judgment of choice of punishment

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act: