logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2014.05.29 2013누1750
도로지정처분취소
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall include the costs resulting from the participation in the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the dismissal of the judgment of the first instance among the judgments of the first instance (attached Form, including relevant laws and regulations), and therefore, it shall accept it as it is in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Attachment] In the first part of the o 3rd part, the “owner” is deleted.

o The 5th page 6 of the 5th page "de facto" is regarded as "de facto".

o The part of the sixth page "division ( June 16, 2006)" is changed to "division ( December 6, 2006)".

o 'W' in Part 13 of the 9th page 13 is moving to 'X'.

o 10 pages 10 - The Building Act in the third place is applied to the former Building Act.

- Of the 16 to 17 roads, the term “419 square meters” and “421 square meters” and “421 square meters” are different from each other as “421 square meters and approximately 2.14 percent.”

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is justifiable, and all appeals by the plaintiffs are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow