logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.01.10 2016가단224360
건물명도
Text

1. The defendant shall deliver to the plaintiff the real estate stated in the attached list.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

3...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a housing reconstruction and improvement project association which has obtained authorization for the establishment of the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul Mapo District as a project implementation district under the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, and the head of Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government grants authorization for the housing reconstruction project implemented by the Plaintiff

6. 9. The notice was made.

B. The Defendant leased and occupied the real estate indicated in the attached list in the project implementation district.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4, purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. According to the above facts of recognition, pursuant to Articles 48-2(1) and 49(6) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, the defendant is obligated to deliver the real estate listed in the attached

B. As to this, the Defendant asserts that it is impossible to respond to the Plaintiff’s claim because it did not receive directors’ expenses and business loss compensation. However, unlike the residential environment improvement project and housing redevelopment project, the Defendant cannot claim relocation expenses, business loss compensation, etc. from the housing reconstruction project without the premise of expropriation or use under the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is justified and acceptable.

arrow