logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2016.10.28 2016노643
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(상습상해)등
Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the point of interference with business.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in this case, which the court below found all guilty, consists of three social facts as follows.

One of them is the crime of interference with business (A) below, and the two remaining (b) are all included in the crime of habitual injury. A.

On July 20, 2015, around 23:00, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s bar business by force by having the customer in the Cheongju-ju-si Da take the victim’s desire to “hing to Chewingly do business” within the “E main shop” operated by the victim D, and thereby obstructing the victim’s bar business by force.

B. On May 14, 1993, the Defendant was sentenced to 15 years of imprisonment with prison labor for murder by the Daejeon High Court, and on February 9, 201, he/she was sentenced to 1 year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (Habitual Injury) at the Cheongju District Court on February 9, 201. On October 19, 2012, he/she completed the execution of the sentence at the Cheongju District Court on February 18, 2014. On October 21, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of bodily injury at the Cheongju District Court on October 21, 2014, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 1.5 million for a crime of bodily injury at the Cheongju District Court on November 23, 2015.

The defendant was habitually injured by the victims at the time of two times as follows.

(1) On October 30, 2015, the Defendant habitually injured the Victim G refers to “H” operated by the Victim G (L, 55 years old) located in Cheongju City considerable amount of Cheongju City on October 23:50, 2015, and “Y” used by the Victim G (L). The Defendant called “Y” to “I who is operating the Defendant’s business,” and read “I who is engaged in the Defendant’s business as follows: (a) telephone defect; (b) “I see what she is going about; and (c) I see, I see, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, and I am am.”

arrow