logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.05.30 2014고단567
자본시장과금융투자업에관한법률위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 100,000,000.

In order to order the provisional payment of an amount equivalent to the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 23, 2007, the Defendant added a trade name for the purpose of pharmaceutical manufacturing business to D. On April 20, 2010, the Defendant merged A Co., Ltd. on April 20, 201, changed A Co., Ltd. to A Co., Ltd. on April 22, 2010, and is a stock-listed corporation.

E, from May 23, 2007 to January 21, 2013, as the representative director of the defendant, has overall control over the overall operation of the company, and the representative director has substantially operated G Co., Ltd. (the defendant merger with the defendant on October 20, 201), which is the wife F Co., Ltd. (the defendant merger with the defendant on October 20, 201), and H has entered G Co., Ltd on April 21, 2007 and has overall control over the financial management of the defendant and the stock company from May 207.

A stock-listed corporation shall submit a business report to the Financial Services Commission and the Exchange within 90 days after the end of each business year, and shall not make a false description or representation of any material fact in the business report.

E Around December 2008, H instructed H to “hing off sales” and around that time, H prepared the financial statements of 2008 of the Defendant (mutual stock company D at that time) in April 2008. Although there was no sales of I, J, K, L, and M, I submitted to H the Defendant’s Seoul branch’s business report with the Financial Services Commission’s signature and seal attached to the aforesaid material facts as stated on the Defendant’s business report, and signed and sealed the financial statements of 885,071,00 won against J, and 1,329,329,329,320 won against K, and 1,652,66,600 won against K, and 1,052,66,600 won against L, and 76,230,000 won against M to the Defendant’s employees and exchange as stated on the Defendant’s business report.

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of the representative director F of the defendant;

1. Each prosecution of H and E.

arrow