beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
A. From January 2019 to October 201 of the same year, the victim company used the Internet and TV services of an amount equivalent to KRW 618,875,00 and did not pay the said amount, thereby obtaining pecuniary benefits equivalent to the said amount.
B. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act, at the date, time, and place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (a) and at the place, confirmed that he was B by phone, and used B’s resident registration number as if he were B, and used B’s resident registration number unlawfully.
2. The crime committed on March 4, 2019.
A. On March 4, 2019, at the Defendant’s residence located in Suwon-si G, Suwon-si, the Defendant: (a) opened a mobile phone in the name of the Defendant; (b) opened a mobile phone in the name of the Defendant; and (c) sold the existing mobile phone to H to raise living expenses; and (d) opened a mobile phone in the name of the Defendant using a mobile phone (E) and applied for a change of the mobile phone device in the name of the Defendant in the amount of KRW 1,397,000 in the market price without permission of B; and (c) thereafter, the Defendant applied for a change of the mobile phone device in the name of the Defendant in the name of the Defendant without permission of B.
However, the defendant was not B, and there was no intention or ability to pay the price even if the mobile phone device was changed due to the fact that there was a debt equivalent to KRW 1,4810,00 at the time, and most of it was received benefits and used for living expenses, etc.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, as such, by deceiving the victim company and then deceiving it from the victim company, obtained the mobile phone from the victim company with gallonology equivalent to the market price of KRW 1,397,00 at around that time, S10 flus 512G* SM-G975N*).
B. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act, at the time and place indicated in the above paragraph (a) and at the same time, confirmed that the Defendant was B by telephone, and denied B’s resident registration number while driving as B.