Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

At around August 2016, at around Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, 111, the defendant's incentives to be distributed to the above 111 residents for the above 111 representative election, and the defendant's incentives to the victim C, the counterpart candidate for the above election, for the above 111 representative election, for the defendant's incentives to be distributed to the above 111 representative election, and the defendant's candidates for C, who are in charge of the abnormal operation without any consistent criteria for the violation of the management rules and the violation of the above 111 representative election, for the above 111 representative election, have been disbursed as the management expenses for the private case accused by the three representative representatives at the time of performing the position of the 4th representative representative election.

‘The contents of ‘' were written and distributed to the above 111 residents.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out facts.

[1] As the defendant is the person, at the time of the above representative election, a resolution of the representative meeting of the occupants related to the expenditure of the above management expenses and the voting of the resident of the above 111.

Many of the residents who moved after around 2005-2007 had not been well aware of the expenditure of management expenses, and the defendant's assertion that the above timely facts were already known among the residents of the above 111 Dong who were subject to distribution at the time of distribution of the above articles is without merit.

② In light of the contents and nature of the aforementioned timely fact, the degree of efforts by the Defendant to confirm the facts, the situation at the time of the above act, and the degree of infringement of honor of the victim who was damaged by the Defendant’s act, etc., as a whole of the evidence duly adopted and examined in this court, the primary motive or purpose of the Defendant was to have been committed by the Defendant by raising a suspicion of unjust execution of the management fee, which is the fact that the Defendant and the police officer at the time of the commission of the police officer, would be a fatal candidate, and thus, the Defendant would have attempted to have the victim elected from an election to the same representative.

I appear to have shown.