logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.11.29 2016고단2999
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 20, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for obstruction of performance of official duties, etc. by the Daejeon District Court. On April 16, 2016, the Defendant completed the execution of the sentence in the Daejeon Prison.

Criminal facts

[2016 Highest 299] On August 23, 2016, the Defendant demanded the victim E (Namnam, 20 years of age) who is an employee to refund the Nabol straw purchased at the place. However, on the ground that the goods were damaged, the Defendant refused to refund the Nabol 20 years of age. However, on the ground that the goods were damaged, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s convenience store sales business by force by avoiding disturbance, such as leaving the goods on the string, such as hacks and singing.

[2016 Height3741] On August 29, 2016, at the D convenience store operated by the victim FF in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon around 22:5, the Defendant reported the Defendant to the employees of the above convenience store due to interference with business affairs, etc., and discovered the convenience store. The Defendant 23th of the same month knew the Defendant of the facts necessary in relation to the investigation or trial of his criminal cases. The Defendant saw the Defendant as follows: “I opened, filed a complaint with the Defendant, and made the Defendant’s statement that I would like not to do so when I opened.” The Defendant saw the Defendant as his hand. The Defendant continued to set the accounting team up the Defendant’s body to the front inside of the accounting unit, thereby interfering with the victim’s convenience store business and, at the same time, exercised force with the victim’s convenience store business by force.

Summary of Evidence

[2016 Highest 299]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. CCTV-recording photographs (2016 highest3741);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. CCTV photographs (previous records): The results of inquiry, the current status of personal confinement, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the investigation report (attached to the previous records of the same kind and the judgment);

1. The corresponding criminal provisions of the Criminal Act concerning the facts of crime; and

arrow