1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Determination as to the assertion on the cause of claim

A. The facts of recognition 1) E are the Plaintiff on July 13, 2005 and the Plaintiff on July 13, 2005, the Gyeonggi-si Fri (hereinafter “Fri”)

A) G land and H 40 square meters prior to H (hereinafter “instant land”).

(2) The land of this case and each of the instant land are “each of the instant land” in the term “each of the instant land” in the term “each of the instant land” in the term of “1 and each of the instant land” in the term of “1 and 2.

(2) On July 22, 2002, E concluded a sales contract to sell the purchase price of KRW 645 million (hereinafter “instant sales contract”); on April 24, 2007, E completed the registration of ownership transfer for each of the above lands. (2) On July 22, 2002, E sold K’s 1529 square meters to J, and completed the registration of ownership transfer for the said land on July 24, 2002.

The J sold the above land to Defendant C on June 23, 2004 and completed the registration of ownership transfer.

C on December 28, 2005, sold 894/1529 shares of the above land to J and completed the registration of share ownership transfer on December 29, 2005.

On March 6, 2007, the land was divided into 625 square meters before K and 894 square meters before L.

C is "K site of 625 square meters or less of K on June 27, 2007."

On the same day, on June 26, 2007, the registration of ownership transfer for the whole share was completed due to the partition of co-owned property as of June 26, 2007. On the same day, C completed the registration of ownership transfer for Defendant D based on the sale contract (sale price of KRW 245,760,000) dated June 26, 2007. After the completion of the registration of ownership transfer on February 16, 2007, C newly constructed a house on the K site and completed the registration of ownership transfer for Defendant D on November 23, 2010 on the same day (transaction price of KRW 50,00,00) as shown in the separate sheet, and the Defendants had access to the land adjacent to G and the land of this case, and they had used each of the instant land to enter the K site and the land of this case.

Facts that there is no dispute over the basis of recognition, A No. 1.