beta
Text
The defendant shall be innocent.
Reasons
1. The Defendant is a person who operates a new fish farm, which is a land seawater fish farming business, in Jeonsung-gun, Jeonsung-gun.
A person who intends to cultivate marine animals or plants at artificially developed sea waters shall obtain permission for inland sea farming business from the head of the competent Si/Gun/Gu, but the defendant cultivated 300,000 as a new fish nursery in the above new fish nursery around July 30, 2018, even though the permission for the new fish farming business was expired on March 31, 2017.
Accordingly, the defendant cultivated marine animals and plants in land sea waters artificially created without permission.
2. Comprehensively taking account of the following circumstances revealed by the court’s duly adopted and examined evidence, the Defendant’s act in the facts charged appears to constitute inland fish farming in the Inland Water Fisheries Act. It is difficult to recognize that the Defendant’s act constitutes an act requiring permission for inland seawater fish farming under the Fisheries Act solely based on the evidence submitted by the prosecutor.
① 피고인은 2018. 8. 16.경 전남 보성군 B 외 10필지에 축제식 양식시설을 설치하여, 내수면어업법에 따른 육상양식어업 신고를 하고 2018. 7. 30. 위 양식장에 흰다리 새우 치어 30만 미를 입식하였고, 이에 대하여 보성군수는 위 내수면어업법에 따른 육상양식어업신고를 반려하는 처분을 한 사실 ② 피고인은 2018. 9. 14.경 전라남도행정심판위원회에 위 내수면어업신고반려처분 취소청구를 제기하여, 위 행정심판위원회는 2019. 1. 31.경 위 보성군수가 한 내수면어업신고반려처분을 취소하는 재결을 하였고 위 재결은 그대로 확정되어 2019. 2. 27. 내수면어업 신고가 수리된 사실 ③ 통상 염분 농도가 0.05psu 이하이면 담수, 0.5~30psu는 기수, 그 이상이면 해수로 구분하는 데 위 양식장에 채워진 물은 염분농도가 9.2‰ 2018....