logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2017.03.10 2017고단62
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months, by a fine of 1,500,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A On November 24, 2016, the Changwon District Court sentenced a two-year period of suspension of execution to six months of imprisonment for fraud, which became final and conclusive on December 2, 2016.

[2017 Highest 62]

1. Defendant A

A. On August 26, 2016, the Defendant violated the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging sexual traffic (sexual traffic) committed sexual intercourse by receiving KRW 100,00 won per sexual intercourse from seven male customers, who were employed by the “F sexual traffic business establishment” operated by E, and visited the said officetel, after being employed by the “F sexual traffic business establishment” operated by E, around August 26, 2016, and the same year.

9.6. On June 1, 200, two male customers visiting the said officetels at the above location were engaged in sexual intercourse by doing sexual intercourse in the above way.

B. On September 6, 2016, the Defendant: (a) entered the name of the birth applicant, I and resident registration number J in a written statement in order to conceal the fact that an “tel sexual traffic” is controlled by the police and voluntarily accompanied at the office H office of the Masan-si Police Station located in the Simsan-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si; (b) entered the details of the sexual traffic in the name of the birth applicant; and (c) signed the statement I on September 6, 2016 with the signature of the person who made the statement at the end of September 6, 2016.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a copy of a written statement in the name of I, which is a private document on proof of facts.

(c)

The Defendant, at the time and at the place specified in paragraph (1) of Article 1, submitted a forged statement to the assistant K belonging to the above police station, who was aware of the forgery, as if it were a document duly formed.

(d)

The Defendant signed the letter of voluntary accompanying consent, “voluntary submission”, “written waiver of ownership”, and “written consent to the destruction of seized articles” on the foregoing grounds at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) of Article 1, and signed the letter of consent to the destruction of seized articles as “I who is the birth person’s name,” and affixed it accordingly.

Accordingly, the defendant has forged I's signature for the purpose of exercising.

E. The Defendant is aware of the date and time indicated in paragraph 1(a).

arrow