logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.11.28 2019나8732
구상금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation regarding the instant case are as follows, except for supplement of the first instance judgment in addition to the following circumstances revealed by the evidence submitted by the court of first instance and the court of first instance with respect to the Plaintiff’s assertion, and therefore, it is identical to the reasons for the first instance judgment. As such, this is cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

[c] The accident of this case occurred due to the collision of the pumps of this case, which was located at the top of the O-dong of a horizontal line merchant while Ma, who is a driver of this case, was in the N-dong from the N-dong to L-dong, with the "bb" (the metal shoot that moved around the axis above jibr's tower). However, the defendant C was unable to confirm the above crane's boom or pumps boom which was on the ground with the height of 60 meters on the ground, and it was difficult to view it as the ground, while it was sufficiently possible to see that M-, who was operating the boom of this case at the driving room located on the upper part of the driver's tower, was in the front part of the crick, and it was difficult to view it as the boom of this case at the time of the collision with the driver's boom of this case, as the accident of this case, as the driver's boom of this case, at the port of this case.

2. Conclusion, the judgment of the first instance court is legitimate, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow