logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2015.11.10 2014고단3719
게임산업진흥에관한법률위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From February 19, 2014 to March 31, 2014, the Defendant installed the “F Gameland” in Scheon-si E, and provided the customers with 55 games of the “Jacheon-si”.

The game machine was rated as a game product, an example, a chain, or an automatic progress with five copies of the card.

However, if the defendant enters the winning section according to the value established on the probability data, the defendant provided the contents of the game machine differently from the classification of the game machine so that the winning results can be achieved after one of the background scenario posters appeared.

As a result, the Defendant provided game products with contents different from the contents classified by the Game Rating Board in the above manner.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the suspect interrogation protocol of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Game description;

1. Results of an appraisal (76 pages of investigation records, game products management committee);

1. A copy of the appraisal result letter (265 pages of investigation records, Korea Copyright Commission) ① The appraisal result letter prepared by the Game Management Commission stated as “a confirmation of the role of informing in advance the winning results of the game to the Bobner game and the background scenario master, which was rated as having no relation with the game result,” and also the appraisal result letter prepared by the Korea Copyright Commission, “5 music staff files and video files containing the size and location information of images” were also changed, and the files were deemed as files that can be used as examples in actual games.

The defendant's assertion that it was stated as ‘the game room operator' and ‘the game room operator' did not confirm whether the game product was operated in the same way as the rating classification was received.

arrow