The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Around May 22, 2020, the summary of the facts charged was connected to the Defendant’s cell phone with his own figure account (C) at the Defendant’s residence located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seongbuk-gu, and damaged the honor of the victim by openly expressing the facts through an information and communications network with the intent to defame the victim by openly expressing the fact, with the victim’s photograph, “The Defendant: (a) coming from the Defendant’s death in Seongbuk-gu, Seoul; (b) going to the Defendant’s private village; (c) linking the club with the fluor; and (d) linking the members of the club; and (c) blocking the Defendant’s fluort with the wind of the 30-year wind.”

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-compliance (Article 70 (3) of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc.);

B. Indication of the victim's intention not to punish after the prosecution of this case

(c) Judgment dismissing public prosecution (Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act);