logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.06.11 2014나46527
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff ordering payment is revoked.

The defendant shall make the plaintiff 11,570.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) the pertinent part of the judgment of the first instance is modified as stated in the following 2; and (b) it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except to supplement or add the judgment as stated in the following 3. Therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

2. Revised parts

(a) 4 under 3rd and 4 vehicles “B” on the second floor of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Gangnam-gu Q Ground Building with approximately 250 meters away from the point of this case 1 modified as follows:

나. 3쪽 마지막 행의 “¹”과 4쪽의 각주 부분을 삭제

(c) by adding “including 12” of the 8th 12 pages to the following:

(d) Deleted.

(e) to “(9)(7)(3)”, and to “(4)(3)”, 12(3).

(f) at the nine to eight (8) pages “the Defendant” to the Plaintiff “a modification to the Defendant”

(g) Change to “B” on the 11th 12th 11th mal judgment

(h) Deletion from 12 th to 13 th.m.;

(i)the 13-party 7-party c) amendment ";

(j) On April 24, 2010, the defendant, upon entering into the contract of this case with the plaintiff on April 24, 2010, agreed to provide the plaintiff with all documents, including taxes and public charges, taxes, and receipts for all miscellaneous expenses (related to the business and facilities of this case No. 1) before the plaintiff's moving into the contract of this case, and deducted them from the balance of the seller (the defendant) for which it is impossible to make occasional settlement from the balance (Article 2), 50 million won as to the building of this case entered into with C, 30 million won as to the lease contract of this case, and 3 million won as to the lease deposit of this case from the plaintiff on April 3, 2010, and 30 million won as follows.

arrow