logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.02.15 2018고단2211
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A From October 18, 2010 to May 29, 2013, the victim C’s dental hospital received dental therapy and continued to be maintained until December 12, 2017. Defendant B is the mother of Defendant A.

1. Around 12:00 on January 4, 2018, the Defendants’ joint criminal conduct and Defendant B’s insultd the above dental clinic located in Gwangju-gu, Gwangju-gu requiring the victim E (34 years of age, female) who was an assistant nurse to delete the screen image taken by Handphones at the time when the victim E (34 years of age, female) was at the time of the above dental clinic, and Defendant A, by hand, walked the victim’s shoulder at one time in a way that he was pushed down twice the shoulder of the above victim’s shoulder and walked the left side bridge at one time, and Defendant B, by carrying out the above victim C’s desire such as “scopic and unscopic will”, and then pushed the victim E’s right shouldered by hand.

Therefore, although the victims requested the Defendants to leave the hospital, the Defendants did not comply with the request, and the Defendants were able to take a bath in the clinic from 12:57 on the same day to 12:57 on the same day, and lying the victim on the softens.

Along about 40 minutes of pulse and highness by failing to comply with the Gu and demanding refund, other patients could not enter the Gu for 40 minutes.

As a result, Defendants jointly assaulted victims E, and required to leave.

At the same time, he refused to the Gu and interfered with the victim C's hospital services by force.

At the same time, Defendant B abused the victim C openly.

2. On January 6, 2018, Defendant A’s house located in Naju City F around 18:42, and the fact was affected by the Defendant due to the victim C’s treatment. However, even if the victim C’s treatment did not result in the side effect on the Defendant, Defendant A’s correction treatment was erroneous with the victim C’s protopy photo and internal and external photo of the hospital, along with the victim C’s protopy photo so that a large number of unspecified people can read the text.

arrow